ICT4D researchers and practitioners seem to continuously run after the latest trends in ICT to fulfill funding calls, forgetting the real needs of the communities which are supposedly empowered by ICT4D activity. In this manner, ICT4D becomes an endless series of solutions in search of a (badly) defined problem, with results often unsatisfactory.
The problem is also exacerbated by the fact that many ICT4D practitioners are based at, or strongly influenced by, institutions and organizations of the global north. Can we break this pattern? If so, then the conversation should focus on advising on how to break it in practice in different contexts and scenarios.